Sunday, July 24, 2005

Brooks belongs in Lifestyles

Dude, what is this crap doing in the Op-Ed section of the Times?!? Kristof is writing about North Korea, Rich about the Plame Scandal, Specter about the confirmation hearings, and all Brooks can manage is some poorly written diatribe about kids and parents on airplanes. Doesn't he have anything better to write about in today's world?

I hate unruly kids and crappy parents just as much (ok, more) than the nexy guy, but this kind of junk should draw admonishments from the editors of the Oshgosh Gazette, for cryin' out loud.

Thursday, July 21, 2005

Google Moon

This is pretty cool (and funny... be sure to zoom in all the way)

Imagine if Dick Durbin said this

From the American Progess Action Fund:

Commenting on the left's opposition to President Bush's Supreme Court nominee John G. Roberts, Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) observed, "It's a little bit like biblical Pharisees, you know, who basically are always trying to undermine Jesus Christ."

Education: the wheels of the economy

Herbert has a good column on education, but not due to anything he writes... rather, some rep from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has some very clear, succinct, and true words:

"It may sound like hyperbole," said Mr. Vander Ark, "but this is the economic development issue for our society, and it is the social justice issue of our times. It is the most important long-term issue for the civic health of the republic.

"In the aggregate, we need more young people educated at higher levels: more finishing high school, more finishing community college, more finishing four-year degrees. And secondly, I think it's very important that we close the racial and socioeconomic gaps in educational attainment.

"We're seeing a scary level of income stratification that is the result of educational stratification. And it's becoming important not just for the economy but for our society that we help low-income [students], and especially kids of color, achieve high levels of education so that they can participate in the economy and in our society."

Damn skippy. On the economy alone, we can't make stuff cheaper than the Chinese and other folks right now, but what we can do is innovate with the best of 'em. Bush has recognized this in speeches, but (surprise!) hasn't done shit about it. In fact, Pell grants and other programs have actually been cut off the rate of inflation. And yes, NCLB was passed, but show me an educator in this country that thinks it is good program (and show me a governor who likes the unfunded mandate and literally impossible-to-achieve standards). NCLB was actually created to pave the way for public school failure and thus build momentum for private school vouchers.

Where are all the grown-ups?

Lucha Libre

You gotta be kiddin' me...

Hey Brooks...

...don't forget to cup the balls.

Wednesday, July 20, 2005

Iraqis may reduce women to 2nd class citizens

Democracy is on the march!

God, this is Scotty... beam me up

RIP

Nuking Mecca

Republicans... such reasonable and rationale folk.

The Stealth Nominee

Roberts? Who?

Exactly.

When I heard the news on CNN last night, I knew what was up... the Bushies chose a blank slate so they can more easily color him in moderate tones and hews as most folks have expected for the heir to O'Connor (although I don't know what they are going to do about the genitalia).

In the Big Issue, Roberts seems to be pro-life, but with some plausible refutation on that score. The Times editorial today said it pretty well:

Compared with many of the possible nominees whose names have been circulating, he has a thin record on controversial subjects. This may have helped him win the nomination because it gives the other side so little to work with. But it also puts a greater burden on the Senate to determine what kind of justice he would be.

Yeah, that Senate has been really prudent and deliberate over the past 5 years.

One thing for certain though: the religious base knows exactly what they are getting... you can put money on it. Calls were made to the Dobsons of that world, and the nominee was certainly vetted. They will take nothing less than a rock-solid vote to overturn Roe, and so if they are happy (and the early returns seem to say they are) then you should be afraid of this guy...

Monday, July 18, 2005

Nanny Blogging

Random blogs have been all a-flurry with posts on a NY Times article in which a working mother and her husband fire a nanny blogger.

As in most situations, the bloggers rally around their own... but while I myself have no big delusions about the state of my blog and blogging in general, I have to admit that Olen's article was pretty surprising in, as many have said, how self-serving it was. She didn't even have the guts to post the url, which the editiors should have done once it got in their hands. That's cowardly.

Anyway, here is one of the best write-ups I have read on it... I encourage you to follow the links and read the Times story and the blogger's remarks before reading the synopsis. And if you are still hungry for more, you can go here.

Sy Hersh

I think the lede for this article should just be your basic assumption, shouldn't it?

As Alterman says:

Sy Hersh demonstrates, once again, that only fools and knaves take the Bush administration’s word seriously about anything at all, but never more so than when it comes to its rhetoric about democracy in Iraq. (They do not take democracy seriously in this country, why would you expect them to do so in Iraq?)

CNN still loves Novak

Here.

"No one really knows what's going on in the investigation of the Valerie Plame incident," Klein said during CNN's Q&A session at Summer TV Press Tour 2005, in response to the very first question: "Why does Robert Novak continue to be employed by CNN?" "It would be awfully presumptuous of us to take steps against
a guy and his career based on second, third, fourth-hand reporting."

How about asking him about it? Look at the guy's notes... he does have editors, doesn't he?

Moving the goalposts

I saw this on CNN and knew someone else had already posted on it, so here are some links.

Why is Santorum such a dick?

Check this out... lots more Santorum/Clergy/Liberals stuff on that site as well.

Saturday, July 16, 2005

Tierney carries the WH water

This is what drives me mad about the NY Times... they have a jackass like Safire write for them for years under the supposed label of "part libertarian" and then get the same to replace him in Tierney. But they both betray the label they trumpet so often at the drop of a hat in order to carry the water of the powers that be in the Republican Party.

But because of several exceptions in the 1982 law forbidding disclosure of a covert operative's identity, virtually no one thinks anymore that he violated it.

Really? Apparantly the CIA (who launched the complaint) and the Justice Dept. (which is obviously rather engaged in an investigation) seem to think so. Anyway, as several other bloggers have pointed out, the issue of violating a law that this very tough to break isn't really that important... the issue is that Rove compremised national security in favor of vindictive politics against someone who upset him. And for that, he should be fired posthaste.
The law doesn't seem to apply to Ms. Wilson because she apparently hadn't been posted abroad during the five previous years.

There are a few fallacies about this one... one is that non-official agents like Plame have contacts with which they work or have worked with in the past. Other CIA agents, CIA fronts, citizens and officials in other countries, etc. When she is outed, anybody she has had contact with is now burned. For example, the CIA front business to which she was attached is now dead in the water.
At the time her name was printed, her face was still not that familiar even to most Washington veterans, but that soon changed. When her husband received a "truth-telling" award at a Nation magazine luncheon, he wept as he told of his sorrow at his wife's loss of anonymity. Then he introduced her to the crowd.

So no crime was committed because Wilson and Plame had the tremerity to show their faces once her cover was blown? Get a life.
But a bipartisan report from the Senate Intelligence Committee concluded that his investigation had yielded little valuable information, hadn't reached the White House and hadn't disproved the Iraq-Niger link - in fact, in some ways it supported the link.

Huh? How did it not yield any valuable info? All it did was disprove one of the key assertions that Bush made in the run up to the war. And how in the world did it support the link? That's a new one... note how he avoids explaining his assertion as if it was common knowledge.
Mr. Wilson presented himself as a courageous truth-teller who was being attacked
by lying partisans, but he himself became a Democratic partisan...

Yeah, he's such a partisan that he donated money to Bush 41's presidential campaign, and was held in high regard by the same.
He denied that his wife had anything to do with his assignment in Niger, but Senate investigators found a memo in which she recommended him.

The issue here is not whether Plame had anything to do with his assignment, but whether Cheney or the DCI signed off on the trip. Cheney didn't request the trip, nor did Wilson say he did. The DCI didn't sign off on it, nor did Wilson say his did, nor would the DCI ever do so or have to do so for an assignment like this. Plame did suggest her hubby, but the division chief had to sign off on it (which he did). The right tries to make this seem like it was nepotism at work, but as has bee repeated pointed out, it is far from clear how a trip to Niger is such a plume assignment... furthermore, Wilson is an expert on African nations including Niger, and served in Iraq!
Karl Rove's version of events now looks less like a smear and more like the truth: Mr. Wilson's investigation, far from being requested and then suppressed by a White House afraid of its contents, was a low-level report of not much interest to anyone outside the Wilson household.

Again, the White House never requested it (Why would they? They were happy with the assertions they could make) nor did Wilson say they did nor would the White House have to do so! To say that the results were not of any interest to anyone is unbelievable in the face of the storm that erupted when the relevation was made and the resultant outing.
Well, there's always the chance that the prosecutor will turn up evidence of perjury or obstruction of justice during the investigation, which would just prove once again that the easiest way to uncover corruption in Washington is to create it yourself by investigating nonexistent crimes.

Well John, if there was no crime, then why would obstruction or perjury be necessary?
For now, though, it looks as if this scandal is about a spy who was not endangered...

Irrelevant. Besides, the outing almost certainly led to the personal endangerment of others, and the inability of the CIA to ever use her in the capacity in which she had been trained ever again.

As Atrios says, blowjobs are far more important to these lying sack-of-shit rat bastards than, you know, national security and WMD proliferation.

Where are the grown-ups in the Republican Party?

Raffy gets 3000

As one of those "talents that you have that don't do you any good," I am a pretty good judge of ability in the major league sports. I was only about 13 or 14 years old when the Cubs decided to trade away Rafael Palmeiro for a bunch of nothing, and I remember lamenting it for weeks... I knew that the latest "Lou Brock" trade in our team's history had just occurred.

And so Raffy became the 4th person in the history of the game to amass 500 homers and 3000 hits. Congrats to Raphael...

Friday, July 15, 2005

Vat Burgers

You gotta check this out...

I think the two most important issues here are "How much does it cost?" and "How does it taste?" Beyond that, it's probably all dressing...

Divorce rates in the military

Link here... via Alterman:

After surviving the chaos of Iraq, thousands of soldiers have become casualties of a fight they were poorly trained for: keeping control of their family lives during the separation of war. Men and women who feel lucky their units suffered few fatalities say they can name dozens who returned to empty houses, squandered bank accounts, divorce papers and restraining orders.

The Army divorce rate has jumped more than 80% since the fighting began overseas in response to the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. The courts around Ft. Hood, the Army's largest post, may have to add another judge to handle the caseload. Divorce lawyers hire extra staff whenever a division prepares to come home.

I have been thinking a lot about the war for the past couple weeks... "every day" as Dubya would say. Anyway, I just don't know if it is worth it to stay. A year ago I don't think I ever would have said that, but I have been constantly edging that way.

More on this to come...

Friday Cat-Blogging

Beware the Lime Cat...

Political Theater

This is kinda amusing... Hillary is creating some noise over a GTA:San Andreas mod that allows "simulated sex" in the game.

Hillary is pretty obviously using this as an opportunity to position herself towards the center/right with soccer moms, fans of Weepin' Joe Liebermann, etc. in 2008, but I can't imagine anything ever coming of this.

"Mods," or modifications of the regular game material, are produced by fans who have too much time on their hands... it is not a product of the game or the company that produces it. As such, if you gave GTA an adult rating, you would have to do so for about any game. The Quake, Doom, Unreal, Warcraft, and Half-Life franchises have all been modded in this manner.

The other humorous item is the innocent stance of the company... sure, modding "violates the game's software user agreement," but programmers could make their games a lot harder to hack if they want to. However, they actually love modders... it helps the buzz of their game and sells copies. Quake II is still a great game due to the extensive number of awesome mods created for it.

Thus the dynamic... software companys push back against the most egregious infringements but generally allow politicians to bluster as much as they want, while politicians (both left and right) create their press releases and condemnations knowing they really won't be able to change any of it. A nice little cynical partnership...

BTW, what exactly is the "simulated sex" they are referring to? Do you have to stick it in the floppy drive or something? And at point, wouldn't the floppy drive now be a hard drive? Thank you, I will be here all week... try the veal, and remember to tip your waitress.

In a class all his own...

Once again, Krugman shows us why he is The Man... better than any op-ed columnist out there, hands down.

Unfortunately, I don't really have an answer to his question at the end of his column. In part, I would cite the Republican Noise Machine that has been built up over the past 25 years. It is so effective and such a hegemony that I imagine folks on the right cannot stop themselves from abusing the hell out of it. Power corrupts and all that... look at the House: it only took the Republicans a few years of power to become far worse abusers of process and politics than the Dems ever were at the height of their power in that same chamber.

What about those who might dissent? When someone has a bazooka, you can hold quite a few people at bay... those with their hands on the controls of the right wing noise machine and the funding apparatus can ensure that the people they want get through the primaries, or that anyone else will risk getting tarred if they done hew to the party line.

The implication here is that there are a lot more "reasonable" or "traditional" conservatives out there than you think, but they have to remain hidden. That may be so, but as this current environment is persisting, a new generation of true zealots is emerging... one that needs little encouragement or threat to be what Rove and others want them to be (e.g. he College Republicans... noxious little thugs). Pretty soon it won't be a coup of small faction that has their hands on the controls, but an entire party of that faction.

And America loses out.

Thursday, July 14, 2005

More on the decline of CNN

BREAKING NEWS! BREAKING NEWS!

Woman gets $74000 water bill... the result of a broken water meter!

Tonight on Aaron Brown: Is this the Year of the Broken Water Meter?

Analysis by Anderson Cooper: Is your family is at risk?

Kylie Brown: Could al Qaeda be behind the outbreak?

Seriously... I don't even think this story would have gotten noticed by the local 10 page daily where I was growing up... WTF?

Bolton and Plame

Eric Alterman puts two and two together in a way that was obvious but nobody has mentioned before:

Did John Bolton play a role in blowing Plame’s cover? Is that why the
administration refuses to release the transcripts of the intercepts he requested
to the senators from whom it is demanding his confirmation?

There has been some discussion about how pro-war items out of State, the most delibrate, conservative, and non-hawkish shop, kept on resurfacing as if by an invisible hand. Bolton is the obvious candidate responsible, and his vindictive nature only adds suspicion.

Random Hollywood Note of the Week

When I first saw the title of this article, I immediately thought "Was it gonoccocal? Maybe Maddox isn't getting a Daddy after all..."

Then I was immediately alarmed that I knew Maddox's name... the Wife's E! Hollywood lifestyle is rubbing off on me. Gack!

BTW, doesn't Brad look kinda like a middle-aged Robert Redford in that pic?

Aaaargh! Stop it! Stop it!

Wednesday, July 13, 2005

Ebbers gets 25 years

Watch yer cornhole, dude...

The new word: Rove deserves a medal

Holy shit...

Hume admits on air that he his first reaction to the London bombings was that it was time to invest in futures, and now Gibson thinks it was a good thing that a CIA agent got outed.

What does it have to take for the Republicans to get just a little upset about stuff like this? What does it have to take for FOX to fire (or at least publically reprimand) one of these assholes?

Update: And more... these guys are really good about staying on message, eh? And note that this is yet again another iteration of this administration's basic strategy: your unassailable strengths are weakness... our pathetic actions are strengths that should be lauded.

Update: TPM notes the same... he has a good phrase: "Moral Inversion"

The Israeli Center

Although I have some quibbles around the edges, Friedman's column today is pretty good... I must admit, I thought that Sharon was as much a barrier to peace as Arafat was, and although I still don't hold him in as high a regard as Friedman for doing what as long been obviously necessary, Sharon has suprised me by gradually altering course.

Imagine that... a leader who alters course based on the facts and the realities in response to the original strategy. Seems like such a dream here in the States...

Speaking of the Death Penalty...

Put all the other reasons why we shouldn't have the death penalty - barbarism, ineffective deterrent, cost ineffectiveness, religion/morality - aside for now... the mere possibility of cases like this is enough to warrent its retirement from use.

Tuesday, July 12, 2005

Death Penalty for Everybody!

What the hell is with the right wing and their fascination with the death penalty? I realize Tierney's column is part tongue-in-cheek, but not entirely... it is more a mask for him to slip it past his editors so he doesn't come off as too harsh. After listing capital punishment as option "D" for the Sasser worm creator, Tierney says:

I'm tempted to say that the correct answer is D, and not just because of the man-years I've spent running virus scans and reformatting hard drives. I'm almost convinced by Steven Landsburg's cost-benefit analysis showing that the spreaders of computer viruses and worms are more logical candidates for capital punishment than murderers are.

Really... I wonder if Tierney would be willing to make the test for capital punishment on a cost-benefit analysis scale for all? Would he endorse Ken Lay and Dennis Kozlowski to get the chair?
I see his logic, but I also see practical difficulties. For one thing, many hackers live in places where capital punishment is illegal. For another, most of them are teenage boys, a group that has never been known for fearing death. They're probably more afraid of going five years without computer games.

Practical difficulties. You know, kinda like how torture has the "practical difficulties" of 1) it is utterly barbaric, and 2) it doesn't really work.

Not something I am keen to joke about, particularly when it covers up an insidious underlying message...

Monday, July 11, 2005

Is Arlen showing some independence?

I don't think this idea is going places, but to me it would seem to signal that Arlen isn't going to be the administration's poodle as it seemed he would be when he was trying to become the committee chair... otherwise, why tweak the noses of the far right over something that I would imagine is very unlikely to happen?

Daily Dose of Bile

Sometimes Coulter is too f'ed up to ignore... via Atrios

Staying the course

This is like the opening quarter of Phantom of the Opera when the new directors of the theater are getting a deluge of notes from the Phantom... another memo from the Brits shows that the US is calling it a war and would like to start to go home at the end of 2006... TPM makes the call.

Friday, July 08, 2005

Oh, for Pete's Sake...

The decline of CNN continues...

Quick, we need another missing white girl! That's what we are *really* good at!

A sign of the times...

Man charged for stealing Wi-Fi...

Pork

Via TPM, Molly Ivins states:

Silverstein reports on earmarks: ''In the past two decades, the pastime has become breathtaking in its profligacy. Even as the federal deficit soars to record heights, the sums of money being diverted from the treasury have grown ever larger. Last year, 15,584 separate earmarks worth a combined $32.7 billion were attached to the appropriations bills - more than twice the dollar amount in 2001 . . . and more than three times the dollar amount in 1998, when roughly 2,000 earmarks totaled $10.6 billion. The process is so willfully murky that abuse has become not the exception, but the rule.

Seems to me that there has been one party in control of that process virtually the entire time, too...

Rehnquist too?

I think Josh is on to something here... if the Dems get squeezed politically and have to let a repugnant candidate through, that will probably allow them to hold firm in order to get a more moderate (and Roe v. Wade supporting) nominee through. Then the balance stays the same and the religious wingers don't get their payday.

Obviously I would like to makes some gains here, but you do the best you can (or at least you should... that friggin' filibuster deal certainly wasn't the best we could do...)

What a difference a few years makes...

Tommy F. on London:

What do I mean? I mean that the greatest restraint on human behavior is never a policeman or a border guard. The greatest restraint on human behavior is what a culture and a religion deem shameful. It is what the village and its religious and political elders say is wrong or not allowed. Many people said Palestinian suicide bombing was the spontaneous reaction of frustrated Palestinian youth. But when Palestinians decided that it was in their interest to have a cease-fire with Israel, those bombings stopped cold. The village said enough was enough.

Huh... methinks that would seem rather out of place when stacked next to his columns in the run-up to Iraq...

Thursday, July 07, 2005

Malpractice: the new Global Warming

Kevin Drum has the details.

Honestly, I am embaressed for my profession... those in my field are pretty smart people, and all they can do on this issue is lash out at the most immediate person (i.e. lawyer) on hand?

FOX wants the French to die...

Literally. Via Atrios, we see Fox's John Gibson spewing thusly:

All day long people have been saying to me, "Wasn't it great they didn't pick Paris?" And I've been saying, "No, no, no."Paris was exactly the right place to pick and the Olympic committee screwed up.Why? Simple. It would have been a three-week period where we wouldn't have had to worry about terrorism. First, the French think they are so good at dealing with the Arab world that they would have gone out and paid every terrorist off. And things would have been calm. Or another way to look at it is the French are already up to their eyeballs in terrorists. The French hide them in miserable slums, out of sight of the rich people in Paris. So it would have been a treat, actually, to watch the French dealing with the problem of their own homegrown Islamist terrorists living in France already....But, alas, they picked London. I like the Brits. I like London. I hate to see them going through all this garbage when it would have been just fine in Paris.C'est la vie. Goes to show the Olympic committee doesn't recognize the perfect opportunity when it presents itself.That's My Word.

I just ate about 2 hours ago, and I am literally sick to my stomach... this is beyond the pale. Who the hell thinks this even approaches anything appropriate? Not to channel Senator Durbin or anything, but if you were to see something of this nature on an Arabic website, you would probably label it as being written from an immoral terrorist.

Try this: what if I said the same thing, but the whole event could somehow be limited to Orange County or some other super-red area? That would be horrid... the French may piss me off of all sorts of different reasons, but these are PEOPLE we are talking about here!

Moral clarity, my ass...

Update: It ain't just the Frogs who FOX wants to see dead...

Forget stats... I have an ancedote!

Herbert channels Friedman in his latest column... but Friedman, who never met a taxi cab driver who he wouldn't use as an allegory for globalization or peace in the Middle East, would never make a bush mistake like this:

I don't have the statistics to prove it, but black kids would be tremendously better off if the cultural winds changed and more fathers felt the need to come home.

Ah, Bob... stick to what you know and leave the BS to Tom.

P.S. For the record, I personally believe that on the whole there is greater strength in a two-parent household; however, I am not going to make such certain assertions on this blog, let along the NY Times, without checking out the statistics. Was Herbert so lazy that he couldn't spend a minute or two of his time (or of his interns' time) on Google or some other engine? Geez...

Wednesday, July 06, 2005

Parenting, Grades reduce STI rates

Huh... image that: engaging your children on the matter and taking a proactive role may be much more important than virginity pledges.

Funny

Hell, even Google knows...

Tuesday, July 05, 2005

What the hell is wrong with Nick Kristof?!?

Nicky has been ok of late, but apparently he was just saving up for this absolute stinker.

Apparently Kristof thinks that staying away from any possibility of averting a genocide is OK because, well, Clinton didn't act appropriately during the one that was on his watch. That sets an awfully low bar, doesn't it? Apparently the only way Kristof would be mad at Bush on Africa is if he let two genocides go during his administration. Remind me again of where that one genocide mulligan rule is written?

And what's with the cover for Bush's failed promises? Yeah, he has increased aid by 2/3's, but as I mentioned previously, that doesn't mean "triple" (and with this administration, WTF is up with assuming it will be "on the way towards" tripling?!?). Furthermore, a lot of the money that is an "increase" really depends on how you are counting the money... for instance, a lot of Bush's initial support to combat HIV was pulled from anti-malaria efforts which, as Kristof has written about before, is making a big comeback in the third world. And decidedly ignoring the benefits of condoms in stopping the spreading od disease somehow makes Bush their friend?

Kristof also fails to acknowledge that the G-8 has been one of the very institutions that has hampered African efforts to pull itself out of the muck. The G-8 is all for free trade and globalization, but when poor Malawian farmers start producing massive amounts of good cotton at prices well below that of the southern states, Bush goes for a targetted tax break or a tariff. South America (especially Brazil) has also been a big victim of such nonsense.

He ends with this:

You need to persuade Mr. Bush to be more generous this week, because his present refusal to help isn't conservative, but just plain selfish.

I'm sorry, but didn't I just read a sloppy wet kiss to Dubya? Kristof (and the editors, who are usually responsible for the title) should absolutely be ashamed of themselves.

Monday, July 04, 2005

Are we sure there were no $14k coffee makers?

Remember the $400 hammers and $2000 toilet seats that were a part of the 80's (i.e. Reagan Administration) wasteful spending?

Well, in this respect, as in many others, Dubya is the true heir to Reagan... not only with independents like Halliburton, but also agencies like Homeland Security. From the American Progess Action Fund:

HOMELAND SECURITY – CONTRACTING CORRUPTION: According to a recent federal audit, $303 million of the $741 million spent by the Transportation Security
Administration to improve security at the nation's airports may have been squandered. The audit charges that the primary contractor hired by the TSA demonstrated a "lack of management or oversight" and failed to justify costs. Examples of the mismanaged $303 million include $1,540 to rent 14 extension cords for three weeks; $1,180 for Starbucks Coffee; $377,273.75 in "unsubstantiated long-distance phone calls" (including $526.95 for a single phone call from Chicago to Iowa City); and $125,400 to rent six magnetometers instead of purchasing them for the going rate of $2,500 to $6,000 each.

SC Standards

This is one of the reasons why I groaned for days upon hearing about the deal that was cut between the "moderates."

If you let the three worst go through, especially when the public was on your side, then WTF was the point?!?

Halliburton

Apologies to the American Progress Action Fund as I am going to post their recent summaries on Halliburton whole-cloth. Remember, due to the inanity of these no-bid contracts, the more they spend, the more profit they make... there are literally incentives to be as wasteful as possible.

----

On Monday, we learned that the many reports of Halliburton's mistreatment of our soldiers and flagrant waste of taxpayer dollars -- tales sometimes so outrageous they were difficult to believe -- were actually just scratching the surface. A new report spearheaded by Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) and Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-ND) uncovered startling new details about Halliburton's misdeeds, including the fact that the amount of taxpayer funds lost to Halliburton is "more than twice as high as those in previous official reports." Indeed, the level of mismanagement of Halliburton's work in Iraq calls into question not simply the Bush administration's fiscal priorities, but the value it places on respecting our soldiers and its management of the war in general.

THE 'MOST BLATANT AND IMPROPER' ABUSE: "Among the costs that Pentagon auditors questioned were $152,000 in 'movie library costs,' a $1.5 million tailoring bill that auditors deemed higher than reasonable, more than $560,000 worth of heavy equipment that was considered unnecessary, and two multimillion-dollar transportation bills that appeared to overlap." In total, more than $1 billion in funds paid to Halliburton were found by auditors to be "questioned," "unreasonable in amount," "inflated," or "excessive," while another $422 million were "unsupported" by the documentation provided by Halliburton. (Even if Halliburton were paid half of the disputed charges that would come from appropriated taxpayer funds, the remainder would be enough to buy more than 3,000 armored Humvees for U.S. troops at $140,000 each.) Despite being advised not to attend the hearings, Bunnatine Greenhouse, the senior civilian contracting official of the Army Corps of Engineers, testified on Monday that Halliburton's actions were "the most blatant and improper contract abuse I have witnessed during the course of my professional career."

TROOPS SERVED ROTTEN, YEAR-OLD FOOD: A former food manager in Iraq for Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg Brown and Root (KBR) testified that the dining hall where he worked in early 2004 routinely served foods that were "outdated or expired as much as a year," or that had been removed from trucks whose convoys had been attacked. "[W]e were told to go into the trucks and remove the food items and use them after removing the bullets and any shrapnel from the bad food that was hit," the manager, Rory Mayberry, said. Yet during the same period, approximately three times each week, "KBR would cater events for KBR employees, like management parties and barbecues" where sanitary food was served. (Mayberry added, "Government auditors would have caught and fixed many of the problems. But KBR managers told us not to speak with auditors.")

EMPLOYEES ORDERED TO BETRAY COLLEAGUES: One of the most heinous revelations of the hearings came from Gary Butters, chairman of Lloyd-Owen International (LOI), a firm overseeing Kuwaiti-Iraq fuel transportation that has criticized Halliburton's fuel transport overcharges. Butters described how, on June 9, 2005, his firm had undertaken a "high-risk task to deliver dining construction goods" to the KBR-managed camp in Fallujah. Just a mile or so out from the camp, he said, "our convoy was ambushed...and we suffered serious casualties in a near four-hour fight. We lost 3 individuals to direct fire, 7 individuals were injured and on arrival at the US base, one US Military person was also sadly injured in an attempt to assist." LOI's subsequent investigation revealed that "KBR Management had taken an extraordinary decision to instruct their on site staff to offer no assistance to the Lloyd-Owen personnel in order to unload KBR goods or prepare for the return journey."

CODDLING THE CULTURE OF CORRUPTION:The Bush administration has thus far refused to crack down on these abuses. Michael Bopp, staff director of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, actually told the Washington Post it was a "misguided assumption that our committee, or any committee, needs to hold a hearing to figure out what Halliburton is doing in Iraq." Indeed, on many occasions, Halliburton has been rewarded for regularly bilking Americans. Among many other examples, Defense Department officials have "overruled the objections of career officials in awarding contracts to Halliburton; waived the requirements of federal procurement regulations for Halliburton without justification; disregarded auditor warnings in negotiating additional contracts with Halliburton; and provided the company with millions of dollars in unjustified fees." And, as the report points out, auditors last year "suggested in a written memorandum that the Department's failure to take action was encouraging Halliburton's continued disregard of U.S taxpayer interests."

Triple? Oh, I meant a third...

Brookings reports that Bush has increased aid to sub-Saharan Africa by 56% (or 33% excluding food and security) rather than by triple as he has claimed...

As I pointed out in a recent post related to Darfur, Bush scribbled "Not on my watch" in the margins of a final report on Rwanda that was given to him at the beginning of his term. Well, not only has he let Darfur go on during his watch, he has abdicated moral leadership on HIV in Africa as well. You can say a lot of negative things about Tony Blair, but at least he is not so obtuse as to miss that one...

Freedom's on the march...

... in the United States.

Here's the line that made me the most sick to my stomach:

In one case, a 68-year-old physician and U.S. citizen was hauled away in handcuffs after his suspicious neighbors broke into his apartment and discovered literature on flying.

Happy Independence Day.

Sunday, July 03, 2005

More on the bill coming due...

Conservative anti-abortion groups are already trying to kill a Gonzo nomination...

Me? I'm all for it. Some have suggested that Dubya will throw up a softball for the Dems to reject and then nominate the one they really want (a "consensus candidate") in the second round. This would not be unlike their dealings on tax cuts... expect $600 billion, president wants $1.2 trillion, and the Dems cave for $1 trillion.

However, on this one, I think the Dems would be able to step aside and let the conservatives take the heat and save their firepower for other candidates. Do I want Gonzo to be the one? Hell no... he should never have been AG, let alone a SC justice. But if his nomination is basically DOA and it will fracture the conservatives, I say do it... I don't think it will be worth the gains they will make in the latino population.

"Not on my watch..."

Just a bit more on Dubya's lack of moral leadership...

Boondocks

Very funny...

Bobo's World

Phelps' group protesting military funerals...

Right warns MLB against Soros ownership

I have sat on this link for a couple of days, but ever time I skip by the tab in my browser that has it open, I still get DHP... it really is too much to believe. I have a pretty good imagination, but this outstrips me by a long shot.

Vietnam 2 Pre-Flight Check

An oldie from MediaWhoresOnline by way of Eric Alterman:

VIETNAM 2 PREFLIGHT CHECK

Cabal of oldsters who won’t listen to outside advice? Check.

No understanding of ethnicities of the many locals? Check.

Imposing country boundaries drawn in Europe, not by the locals? Check.

Unshakeable faith in our superior technology? Check.

France secretly hoping we fall on our asses? Check.

Russia secretly hoping we fall on our asses? Check.

China secretly hoping we fall on our asses? Check.

SecDef pushing a conflict the JCS never wanted? Check.

Fear we’ll look bad if we back down now? Check.

Corrupt Texan in the WH? Check.

Land war in Asia? Check.

Right unhappy with outcome of previous war? Check.

Enemy easily moves in/out of neighboring countries? Check.

Soldiers about to be dosed with *our own* chemicals? Check.

Friendly fire problem ignored instead of solved? Check.

Anti-Americanism up sharply in Europe? Check.

B-52 bombers? Check.

Helicopters that clog up on the local dust? Check.

In-fighting among the branches of the military? Check.

Locals that cheer us by day, hate us by night? Check.

Local experts ignored? Check.

Local politicians ignored? Check.

Locals used to conflicts lasting longer than the USA has been a country? Check.

Against advice, Prez won’t raise taxes to pay for war? Check.

Blue water navy ships operating in brown water? Check.

Use of nukes hinted at if things don’t go our way? Check.

Unpopular war? Check.

Carbon Emissions and the Economy

Kristof talks today about the need to reduce carbon emissions and points to Portland, Oregon as evidence that action in this area can be a boon and not the economic drain that conservatives claim it will be.

I am not too high on ancedotal cases, and it is possible that Portland has some other characteristics about it that have made these transitions a bit easier to handle. However, the things that they have done and the results appear to be very encouraging.

And that's with Kristof missing what I think to be the most important component of all this... yes, it isn't burdensome, it saves the city money, and it attracts people, but there is also this (bolds/italics mine):

What's more, officials in Portland insist that the campaign to cut carbon emissions has entailed no significant economic price, and on the contrary has brought the city huge benefits: less tax money spent on energy, more convenient transportation, a greener city, and expertise in energy efficiency that is helping local businesses win contracts worldwide.

When Bush talks about how carbon emissions would hurt our economy, what he really means is that it would have hurt the oil and coal business sector. He can't even say the "energy sector" because it would have been a boon to nuclear power, green technology, and alternative fuels. And how is it that oil is so great? Isn't that currently acting as a drag on our economy right now with prices through the roof?

If Bush were to end all the unnecessary tax cuts and subsidies to the coal and oil industries and perhaps throw a couple towards green technology and development, I would wager that our total economic picture would be as good or better while reaping the benefits of a better environment. But that's not what is driving Bush... he is completely in bed with the traditional energy sector, and as long as they are stuffing his pockets and those of other conservatives with cash, he will continue to sell out our economy and the environment.

Saturday, July 02, 2005

Get Your War On

Get Your War On has got to be my favorite comic strip... I encourage you to read the entire achives online to get a full appreciation of the snark, but here are a few good ones from the recent past:



Roe v. Wade

The bill has come due...

The Stain of Torture

This is an excellent column by the former physician to Bush 41...

Our medical code of ethics requires us to oppose torture wherever it is inflicted, for any reason. Guided by this ethic, I served as a volunteer with the international group MEDICO in 1963, taking care of people who had been tortured by the French during Algeria's civil war. I remain deeply affected by that experience today -- by the people I tried to help and could not, and by their families, which suffered the most terrible grief. I heard the victims' stories, examined their permanently broken bodies and looked into faces that could not see me because of the irreparable damage done not only to their senses but also to their brains. As I have studied reports of torture throughout our troubled world since then, I have always found comfort in knowing that at least it did not occur here, not among Americans.

Now that comfort is shattered. Reports of torture by U.S. forces have been accompanied by evidence that military medical personnel have played a role in this abuse and by new military ethical guidelines that in effect authorize complicity by health professionals in ill-treatment of detainees. These new guidelines distort traditional ethical rules beyond recognition to serve the
interests of interrogators, not doctors and detainees.

The last paragraph is perfect:
America cannot continue down this road. Torture demonstrates weakness, not strength. It does not show understanding, power or magnanimity. It is not leadership. It is a reaction of government officials overwhelmed by fear who succumb to conduct unworthy of them and of the citizens of the United States.

Go check out the whole thing.

Side note: as a part of a fellowship I held, I was a participant in a medical ethics seminar. During one session, I was assigned to present from the standpoint that military medical personnel should be a part of the intelligence-gathering apparatus. I did so as best I could, but I felt... I guess "slimey" would be the word... during the entire thing. As a result of this incident, I can't imagine folks in the government who shill for things they are utterly opposed to, either ethically and/or intellectually... the soulless whoring that would be required is beyond me.

Friday, July 01, 2005

Come along then, Tommy... before zee Germans get here...

There is a large basketball camp going on here, and a labmate of mine was walking by while a team was getting ready to take a court after half-time. It was apparent by the long faces that they were losing, and my buddy heard one of the coaches say:

"C'mon girls... we didn't give up when the Germans were bombing Pearl Harbor, did we?!?"

In cases like this, I really wonder how we became a superpower... not only is the overall notion of invoking any World War II references in a middle-school girls' basketball camp completely retarded, but it was the friggin' Japanese, not the Germans!

Asshat...

P.S. The title is a "Snatch" reference, in case you were wondering... a favorite movie of mine...

Musings on O'Connor

I heard about O'Connor earlier in the day, and due to the fact that I was working on some time-sensitive material I didn't get a chance to check out the media and blogs on it right away. I thus decided to make this post "blind," i.e. without seeing the circumstances or any opinions on what will come next, etc.

My basic take: get ready for a shitstorm. We all knew that the filibuster deal made between moderates in the Senate would be tested sooner or later, but nobody thought it would be to replace one of the non-hardcore right wingers on the court. In my view, this is an entirely different ballgame... the right has a chance to pick up a solid vote here, particularly on the issue of abortion, rather than nailing down an already-held seat (i.e. Rehnquist's) for another length of time.

Bush won't select anyone other than a hardcore winger... that much is certain. But how will that effect and be affected by other issues such as privatization of social security and the war? Could a defeat here completely neuter the administration? Or is it an opportunity to get everything back in line? ("In line" insofar as their approval rating and not necessarily employing good policies)

As far as O'Connor is concerned, screw her... she has been lauded as this great moderating voice, but what has she really done except keep Roe v. Wade off the table? Her vote and opinion in Bush v. Gore was a low point in the country's history, and my dim view of her was sealed with her vote and opinion in the Andrade case.

More later after I have had the chance to do some reading...